Kathleen Laurie | Vice President, New Business Development - Proposal Services and Support
Nate Wible | Executive Vice President, Managing Director - Medical Communications
Effective advisory board meeting participation goes beyond simply gathering experts in a room. While securing the right people (Part 1) and preparing a thoughtful, goal-oriented pre-meeting approach and agenda (Part 2) are essential steps, they alone do not guarantee engagement. The true challenge lies in fostering active, meaningful participation, where advisors are heard and valued.
At Precision AQ Medical Communications, we know how a well-structured participation strategy can make the difference between superficial input and deep, actionable insight. This third installment of our Four “Ps” series focuses on Participation—how to create an interactive experience that encourages advisors to think critically, debate constructively, and contribute to strategic outcomes.
Participation in an advisory board meeting is about creating an interactive experience where advisors are actively engaged in problem-solving, idea-sharing, and strategic thinking. Too often, we see advisory board meetings that rely on dense slide decks, sometimes up to 100 slides presented without pause for reflection or discussion. This format not only disengages participants but also undermines the purpose of the meeting itself.
Successful participation means moving beyond passive information delivery to:
Our experience has shown that the most fruitful advisory board meetings dedicate no more than one-third of the meeting time to didactic presentations. The rest should be devoted to interactive discussions and activities that challenge assumptions and generate new perspectives.
The most effective participation strategies align with the meeting’s specific goals. Around a decade ago, advisory board meetings often took a one-size-fits-all approach, bringing 15 to 20 advisors together for a full day, covering 20 or more topics. This exhaustive format aimed to capture everything in one session but often left advisors fatigued.
Today, best practices emphasize focused, topic-specific engagements, particularly in virtual or hybrid settings. Advisory board meetings are now designed to address one or two strategic objectives at a time, with shorter, more targeted discussions. This approach not only respects advisors’ time but also ensures that the insights gathered are relevant and actionable. By narrowing the focus, sponsors can dive deeper into specific challenges, allowing advisors to apply their expertise more effectively.
Participation thrives on variety and creativity. Moving beyond the lecture format encourages advisors to contribute openly and think laterally. Here are some of the innovative formats that have proven successful:
By integrating these diverse formats, sponsors can create an environment where participation is active, continuous, and grounded in real-world application.
A skilled moderator is critical to maintaining momentum and depth in the discussion. The moderator should be adept at:
It is often advantageous for the moderator to be a neutral third party rather than a member of the sponsoring company. This neutrality encourages honest, unguarded feedback, as advisors may feel more comfortable sharing critical perspectives with someone who is not directly affiliated with the client.
Experienced moderators are skilled at balancing structure and spontaneity, ensuring that the session remains productive while allowing for organic dialogue. This balance is crucial in making the advisory board meeting feel like a collaborative, rather than directive, exercise.
In a recent survey, it was found that approximately 76% of respondents preferred meetings with a virtual component. Advisors appreciate the flexibility, but it requires thoughtful adaptation:
To accommodate diverse preferences, some sponsors opt for a hybrid approach, combining live sessions with asynchronous input. For instance, a preliminary asynchronous discussion can prime advisors for the live session, while a post-meeting survey can capture reflections and ideas after they’ve had time to digest the conversation.
The key is to respect advisors’ time and professional commitments while still gathering the insights needed for strategic decision-making.
Active participation depends on creating a safe, respectful environment where advisors feel their input is valued. Demonstrating how advisor feedback informs strategy not only validates their participation but also deepens engagement for future interactions.
Effective participation transforms advisory board meetings from static presentations into dynamic exchanges. By embracing interactive formats, skilled moderation, and advisor-centric planning, sponsors can unlock deeper insights and foster stronger strategic alignment.
In our final installment, we will explore the Path Forward—how to translate advisor input into meaningful action plans that drive strategic initiatives.